All of these have been shown by Kroymann1 to derive from earlier extant manuscripts. As such, their independent witness to the text is nil, since all they can offer is further copyist errors. Consequently they tend to get short shrift in the editions. All belong to the Corpus Cluniacense.
Codex Vaticanus Latinus 190, magnificent, with index at the back
Codex Vaticanus Latinus 191, plain.
Codex Vaticanus Latinus 189. Vol 1 of 3, of a copy of the complete Corpus Cluniacense.
Codex Vaticanus Latinus 192. Vol 2 of 3, of a copy of the complete Corpus Cluniacense.
Codex Vaticanus Latinus 193. Vol 3 of 3, of a copy of the complete Corpus Cluniacense.
Codex Neapolitanus VI B. 14. Luxury, with pictures.
Codex Florentinus Laurentianus 89, 55. Just 3 works, in a codex containing other things.
Codex Florentinus Laurentianus XXVI, 12. Part 1 of a 2 part set
Codex Florentinus Laurentianus XXVI, 13. Part 2 of a 2 part set.
References
See bibliography for more detail on the references.
1. Emil KROYMANN, Die
Tertullien-Ueberlieferung in Italien, Sitzungsberichte der
Philosophisch-Historischen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften,
Wien, 138 (1897 or 1898) 3rd booklet (34 pages). also in 
2. Cf. E.PREUSCHEN, in A.HARNACK, Uberlieferung und Bestand, p. 676, note 13. Not checked. (Details from CCSL 1 table II).
This page has been online since 11th December 1999.