Some sayings by Cicero from the ‘Saturnalia’ of Macrobius

I have been reading the Saturnalia of Macrobius, that curious store of Latin learning from the very end of the empire.  Book 2 contains a collection of witticisms.  Here are a few.

[ 1] But I am surprised, continued Symmachus, that none of you have said anything of Cicero’s jests, for here, as in everything else, he had the readiest of tongues. If it is your pleasure, then, I shall play the part of the mouthpiece of an oracle and repeat as many of his sayings as I can remember. All were eager to hear him and he began as follows.

[2] When he was dining at the house of Damasippus, his host produced a very ordinary wine, saying, “Try this Falernian; it is forty years old. ” “Young for its age,” replied Cicero.

[3] Seeing his son-in-law Lentulus (who was a very short man) wearing a long sword, he said: “Who has buckled my son-in-law to that sword?”…

[ 11] There was another occasion on which Cicero openly jeered at the readiness with which Caesar admitted new members to the Senate; for, asked by his host Publius Mallius to procure the office of decurion for his stepson, he said in the presence of a large company: “Senatorial rank? Well, at Rome he shall certainly have it, if you so wish; but at Pompeii it isn’t easy.”

[ 12] And indeed his biting wit went even further; for, greeted by a certain Andron from Laodicea, he asked what had brought him to Rome and, hearing that the man had come as an envoy to Caesar to beg freedom for his city, he made open reference to the servile state of Rome by saying, in Greek, “If you are successful, put in a word for us too.”

Share

Still more evil-doing by the Church of Scotland at St George’s Tron

I referred in my last post to the extraordinary actions of the Church of Scotland towards one of their own congregations that wanted to leave.  Not a big deal, you would have thought; but the response has been vicious.  Today I have learned of further action, which is even worse.  The BBC story is here.

The Kirk has now written to the charity regulator over “the legality of the transfer of assets” from the Church to the Epaphras Trust before the split. …

The Kirk also states that it has written to the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) about a transfer of assets to the Epaphras Trust, a pastoral training and poverty relief charity which is active in Asia and Africa.

It states: “To claim that the Church of Scotland is acting in a heavy handed manner is, in our opinion, merely an attempt to divert attention away from the real issues here.

“These are nothing to do with differing theologies, but about ownership of charitable assets, and the questionable financial management of the former congregation – in particular the legality of the transfer of assets of the Church of Scotland to the Epaphras Trust before the individuals chose to leave the Church of Scotland.

“We have therefore written to OSCR to raise our concerns about the legality of this, as we consider we have a duty to do under charity law.”

I don’t know the facts, but I would guess that the congregation took the view that things that they paid for themselves belonged to them.  The greed of the Kirk officials must have left them gasping.  Who on earth would imagine that a national church body would send in the bailiffs to rip  hymnbooks out of the hands of worshippers? Most churches would be grateful to get people holding hymnbooks! When a church feels the need to have a parallel trust, it tends to mean that they don’t trust their denomination with money.  And one can see why.

The statement: “before the individuals chose to leave…” seems as if it is deliberately dishonest.  This is a whole congregation leaving, and well the authors of those words know it.  Likewise we may note the pretext that this has something to do with their legal charitable responsibilities, rather than spite and malice.  I believe most churches can give stuff away without worrying about their “legal charitable responsibilities”.  Some might even feel that this is what we expect churches to do.

The statement quoted is online here, which is as good a piece of corporate mendacity as I have seen for a while.  At least the people responsible signed the statement.  They are:

Rev Dr Grant Barclay, Convener, Church of Scotland Council of Assembly.
Rev Dr James Jack, Chairman of the General Trustees of the Church of Scotland.
Rev Stuart Smith, Interim Moderator, Church of Scotland St George’s Tron.

The last named is a curiosity all by himself.  After all, the whole church has left.  However I understand that the Kirk intends to create a mock congregation in order to mislead the courts in the action(s) — they don’t deny that all the litigation has taken place from their side — that they are pursuing, and doubtless is part of that, whoever he is.

Curiously the officials complain:

Much of the press coverage of the situation at St George’s Tron continues to give a very one sided view which misrepresents the situation.

Yet the coverage has been far more favourable than the Kirk deserves, in reality.  There is no excuse for their actions.  They are injuring the community by their actions; injuring the body they are supposed to act for; and displaying a contempt for others which is breathtaking.  Nobody is under any obligation to sue churchgoers for having the courage of their convictions.  Claims that “you stole our property”, when the congregation contributed millions, and the taking is being done by Kirk officials whose greed apparently knows no limits — even down to hymn-books –, are sickening to read.

I also found, with some difficulty, further demands made in June by the Kirk here.  It seems that there was hardly a moment between hearing that the congregation was going to leave and sticking the knife in with a whole series of questionable claims and brazen-faced demands for money:

No decisions have been taken about the on-going use of the building, or the outstanding financial obligations to the Church of Scotland and the General Trustees.” …

  • The Congregation of the St George’s Tron Church have outstanding arrears on their contributions to Ministries and Mission in the Church of Scotland.
  • There is also an outstanding loan made by the General Trustees to the congregation in 2007 to support a remodelling of the building.
  • The St George’s Tron building is owned by the Church of Scotland General Trustees.

Shortly afterwards the Kirk reached for lawyers.

Oh well.  It all shows that St George’s Tron were absolutely right to leave.

Share

Egyptological taken offline by ‘hackers’

Via News from the Valley of the Kings, I learn that an online Egyptology magazine, Egyptological, has been attacked:

Kate and Andrea are very sad to announce that Egyptological will be unavailable for the forseeable future.  It has been targeted by a professional hacking group as part of an onslaught on Egypt-related web sites during the current unrest in Egypt.

Although we have been in negotiations with the hackers, which seemed to be going well, they have now announced their intention of resuming hostilities against us.  They apparently see Egyptology sites such as ours as representing a form of political threat.

Until we have been able to assess the level of damage inflicted upon our backup solution, and have been able to devise a new strategy for the future security of Egyptological, our site will remain unavailable.  We do not expect it to be recovered until the end of January.

This sort of thing is why we will end up with a heavily-policed and locked-down internet.  We shall all be poorer, because the criminal element will not behave decently unless restrained by fear of punishment.  I fear that the old days of the internet are truly dead.

Share

Life of Mar Aba – chapter 35

The hagiographical life of Mar Aba continues.

35. While the King of Kings intended that he should remain a few days after his release, and then go to the cities of his throne, Satan stirred up unrest and rioting through the actions of the heathen in Bet Huzaye.  The Magians accused the Blessed One before the King of Kings: “If the Catholicos had wanted, the rioting would not have broken out.”  Immediately he was chained to a foot-soldier (paig) by a strong chain to the neck, and brought to the court of the King of Kings, and everyone believed that he would be executed immediately.  The King of Kings, exasperated through the slander of the Magians, sent word to him by means of his commissioner (Farruchdâd Hôrmîzd) DZ’DGW: “You are an enemy of Our Majesty, and the Christians have become arrogant because of you.  In many cities they have risen up against the noble Magians, beaten and robbed them, and even now are rioting.  You chose bishops and priests and sent them into the provinces, even though you are in prison; but myself you treat as nothing.  Therefore I command that in the morning you will be taken and thrown into a pit, so that you will die there.”

Share

The Community of St Mary the Virgin, Wantage, Athanasius and the ordinariate

Fans of C. S. Lewis will recall that he wrote a preface to a translation of Athanasius, De incarnatione.  To my surprise, I find that the book is online here, including his preface.  This is a good thing, for it is a very nice translation.

The translation was made by “a religious of C.S.M.V.”  This was Sister Penelope, of the Community of St. Mary the Virgin, Wantage.  The correspondence of C. S. Lewis includes a number of letters between them.

CSMV is that unusual thing, an Anglican order of nuns.  As might be supposed, it emerged from the aftermath of the Oxford Movement in the 19th century, and was founded in 1848.[1]

By accident today I came across a blog post containing some news about it.  This led me to other sources.  It seems that most of the nuns are leaving the Anglican church and becoming catholics.  This includes the Mother Superior, and all the able-bodied nuns.  The frail elderly nuns will be nursed by the rest, even so, although I have been unable to find the page describing what is intended.  It is, I suppose, yet another sad consequence of the demand for women priests, gay priests etc. 

One sad story from 2011 stated that the nuns, many now elderly, had been abused by one of the carers who was supposed to help look after them.

The tribunal was told that the community of Anglican nuns had two elements – the convent housing fewer than 25 nuns and a wing where another 15 elderly, vulnerable and infirm nuns were cared for by a nursing manager, five nurses and 11 care assistants, whose job was to feed and bathe the sisters, and help them attend prayer meetings.

It is good to know that so curious an enterprise still continues, however.

UPDATE: The details from the Mother Superior of the transfer to Rome are here.

Of the twenty two sisters who currently live at the Convent at Wantage, eleven of us believe that we are being called into the full communion of the Catholic Church as part of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham. This discernment has been reached after constant prayer and in discussion with spiritual advisers. These eleven sisters are in the main, but not exclusively, the able bodied members who provide the work and management to keep the Community going, so, since the Ordinariate Community do have to relocate, considerable time has been spent and will continue to be devoted to ensure that the remaining members of CSMV will be well cared for: spiritually, physically, emotionally as well as financially.  …

Those of us who will now enter into the Ordinariate have always had the care of our elderly and frail sisters uppermost in our minds. It has never been our desire or intention that our fellow sisters who choose to remain in the Church of England should be neglected in any way; quite the contrary. We have been working ceaselessly to ensure that in our absence there will be continuing care for those sisters who remain and who need it and that suitable trustees of the CSMV’s charity will be appointed in place of myself and my co-trustees. This has now been put in place. When we return temporarily, we will be able to help provide support and assistance for the remaining CSMV sisters as they make decisions about their longer term future.  

Share
  1. [1]http://www.oxfordoratory.org.uk/news.php?id=233

Scottish congregation evicted and sued by Church of Scotland

A story of evil-doing by the Church of Scotland officials came to my attention this week.  It has been kept quiet by the establishment, who are really responsible.  The Scottish Herald reports:

LEADERS of the Church of Scotland have been accused of heavy-handed tactics after law officers disrupted a prayer meeting to demand the return of bibles, hymn books and an organ.

The serving of a writ was the latest move in an increasingly bitter wrangle between Kirk leaders and the congregation of one of Scotland’s best-known churches, St George’s Tron in Glasgow.

The congregation has been threatened with eviction from the premises after it split from the Kirk in opposition to the ordination of gay ministers.

As the Kirk intensified its efforts to reclaim property, more than 100 church members were left stunned when Messengers-at-Arms arrived to serve legal papers demanding the return of a number of key items.

The church minister, Rev Dr William Philip, described the arrival of the law officers as frightening and humiliating. He said: “To disrupt a prayer meeting in that way and demand the organ and other key items that were gifted to the congregation, just weeks before Christmas, truly beggars belief.

“Not content to evict us, it seems they are determined to publicly humiliate our leaders and frighten our members, some of whom are vulnerable people.

“It is shameful. Having law officers disrupt a church meeting and intimidate a church is something we associate with China or former Soviet dictatorships but is the last thing we expected from the so-called national Church.

“We have sought to avoid going to the courts at every opportunity which is why we took the decision to vacate the building rather than fight for it, trusting God as we enter this new phase of ministry to which he has called us. But to do this we need resources like our hymn books, organ and bibles, so we have been left with no other option but to contest this petty and ridiculous action.”

The incident comes after The Herald revealed the congregation and minister clashed with the Church of Scotland over ownership of church buildings when it quit the main body of the Kirk over its stance on allowing gay ministers.

Mr Philip added: “My family is now living in fear that the manse will be stormed in the same way to force us out of our home on to the street before Christmas. It is horrible.”

My first reaction was to wonder what all this was about.  The Christian Institute has more details.  Apparently the Church of Scotland, at the bidding of the non-Christian world, intends to ordain gays as ministers, albeit with much hand-wringing and delays.  We all know that unnatural vice is one of many evils prohibited in scripture, and this is probably why the world demands that the church submit and endorse it.  This is what persecution looks like, after all – some minor issue is used as an excuse to persecute for non-conformance. 

St. George’s Tron is a large church in that denomination.  Rightly supposing that the processes can have only one end, they have rightly decided that they cannot in conscience remain part of that organisation. 

The response has been vicious.  The Church of Scotland officials have, as I understand it:

  • demanded that the congregation either surrender or vacate the building (which they recently spent 2.5 million pounds — around $4m dollars — to put in order);
  • demanded that the congregation also pay them 1 million pounds (around $1.5m) to repay a loan, made by the denomination to its congregation to refurbish a building which the denomination claims to own;
  • demanded that the congregation also hand over the minister’s house, or manse, which the congregation purchased for its minister, thereby rendering him and his family homeless;
  • demanded that the congregation also hand over its bibles, hymn books, etc.

All this seems to be pure spite, of course, and to intimidate the many congregations that might do the same.  The Church of Scotland has many empty buildings, so it has no need for the St Georges Tron building.  It proposes to install a “new congregation”; but of course this is just a fake group, with an eye to probable court cases, for if the Church of Scotland could create viable congregations by fiat, it wouldn’t have buildings standing empty.  Likewise it is pretty cheeky to demand that a bunch of people kicked out pay for a building that they don’t own; this demand is designed to load the congregation with a debt, hopefully causing it to disband.

St George’s Tron chose to leave their building rather than litigate.  The Church of Scotland apparently is determined to force them into the courts, by means of the demand for money.

What I would like to know, however, is the effect on giving in the Church of Scotland.  For who on earth would donate a penny to it, if so doing can be repaid so vilely?  Why refurbish your parish church?  It isn’t yours, and may be taken from you at a moment’s notice.  Why pay for clergy housing?  Why buy hymn books?  And so on.

I thought that the days of this kind of religious viciousness were over.  It is sad to see them return.

Share

Life of Mar Aba – chapter 34

The 6th century “Saint’s Life” of the East Syriac patriarch, Mar Aba, continues.  He has been loaded with chains, and is now being marched along on an expedition that the Sassanid Persian King of Kings is making up-country.  The Persian fire-priests at court are still trying to get him. 

After the Saint had been dragged along in these fetters in the wake of the king for about 400 parasangs, until the King of Kings went down to the (two) cities, he went down also and lived in fetters with his disciples in a house, where by the power of Christ he managed the patriarchate and all its obligations.  Then the King of Kings commanded, in his goodness, that he should be freed;  but the Magians persisted in their usual hostility and left the Saint in his fetters.  Once the King of Kings departed from the (two) cities, he was taken in chains in the wake of the court to a place named PS’I.  After they had tortured and tormented him in these hard fetters and the wonderful beauty of his patience in the fear of God had been revealed, then almighty God, the Lord of All, in his wonderful power, through his inexpressible works, gave an irresistible hint to the mind of the King of Kings, so that he sent and by a miracle loosed the athlete (ἀθλήτης) of Christ from all his fetters.  Then there was great joy in the whole people of God and they offered praise and worship.

How much of this is historical, and how much folk tale, as with all such literature is very hard to tell.  But the interest of this near contemporary account is that the Sassanid monarchy really did change its policy during this period, coming to see the Nestorian Christians as a possible useful counter-balance to the power of the Zoroastrian clergy. 

In this chapter again we see that the King of Kings had no interest in resolving the dispute, but was entirely happy to keep the patriarch dangling in front of the Magians, sometimes offering them some of what they wanted, other times not.  It kept the Magians occupied, rather than engaged in their time-honoured past-time of plotting against the throne.

Share

Nicht Christus folgen, sondern Horst Wessel!

Now for something completely different.  This evening I came across a purported quotation from an anti-Christian Hitler Youth song.   I was suspicious, for it seemed a little too good to be true, but it appears to be genuine.  It ran in part as follows, in English:

We are the happy Hitler Youth;
We have no need for Christian virtue;
For Adolf Hitler is our intercessor
And our redeemer.
No priest, no evil one
Can keep us
From feeling like Hitler’s children.
Not Christ do we follow, but Horst Wessel!
Away with incense and holy water pots…[1]

A little experimenting with German leads us to the original, of which the translation seems somewhat inaccurate:

Wir sind die fröhliche Hitlerjugend,
Wir brauchen keine christliche Tugend,
Denn unser Führer Adolf Hitler
Ist stets unser Mittler.

Kein Pfaffe, kein böser, kann uns je hindern,
Uns zu fühlen als Hitlers Kinder.
Nicht Christus folgen wir, sondern Horst Wessel,
Fort mit Weihrauch und Weihwasserkessel!

Wir folgen singend unseren Fahnen
Als würdige Söhne unserer Ahnen,
Ich bin kein Christ, kein Katholik,
Ich geh mit SA durch dünn und dick.

Die Kirche kann mir gestohlen werden,
Das Hakenkreuz ist Erlösung auf Erden,
Ihm will ich folgen auf Schritt und Tritt,
Baldur von Schirach, nimm mich mit![2]

I.e.:

We are the happy Hitler Youth,
We need no Christian virtue,
Because our leader Adolf Hitler,
Is always our mediator.

No priest, no wrongdoer can ever hinder us,
From feeling like Hitler’s children.
We do not follow Christ but Horst Wessel,
Away with incense and holy water!

We follow our flags singing,
As worthy sons of our ancestors,
I am no Christian, no Catholic,
I’ll go with the S.A. through thick and thin.

The church can be stolen from me,
The swastika is redemption on earth.
I will follow it step by step,
Baldur von Schirach, take me with you!

We need merely imagine the environment in which such sentiments could be uttered without embarassment.  Such is the power of media control and suppression of any other opinion.

But where does this material come from? 

Among the search results is a court record of the trial at Nuremberg of Baldur von Schirach, the leader of the Hitler Youth.[3]:

Mr. DODD: Refer to p.228 of the daybook.  You will find that a chaplain, Heinrich Muller, and a parish priest, Franz Rummer, were charged because they had discussed in circles of Catholic priests that the Hitler Youth were singing the following song on the Nazi Party Day in 1934: …

Wait until I have finished.

VON SCHIRACH: I haven’t found it yet.

Mr. DODD: It is on p. 228a and b.  My apologies.

Perhaps you will remember the song if I read it to you?  You know the line, “We do not follow Christ, but Horst Wessel”?

VON SCHIRACH: This song I am seeing for the first time, I don’t know it.

Mr. DODD: Well, I won’t read on.  However you note that the last paragraph in the day-book reads: “The attorney-general noted that there could be no question that the poem in question had been sung or circulated in Hitler Youth groups.  He believes, however, that the claim could be denied, that the poem had been sung on the Party Day, under the eyes and with the approval, so to speak, of top party officials.”

VON SCHIRACH: The third verse is “I am not a Christian, not a Catholic, Go with the S.A. through thick and thin.”  This shows that this is not a Youth song.  If the Youth sang this song, I regret it.  On the Nazi Party Day in 1934, as stated here, the song was not sung at a celebration of Youth.

Mr. DODD: OK.

VON SCHIRACH: The combined programme for the Youth event for Party Day I myself have read through.

I don’t know the song: I have never heard it, and I do not even know the lyrics.

Mr. DODD: You’ll notice that the last line is “Baldur von Schirach, take me with you!”  It is above all very surprising to the prosecution to hear that you as Youth leader did not know that significant disputes were taking place during these years between the clergy of all the churches in Germany and the Youth organisation.

We need not bother with Von Schirach’s response.  A man on trial for his life before a tribunal of his enemies will say what he feels that he must, but we need not pay any attention now.  Likewise, immediately before this passage, he attempts to pass off various incidents of anti-clerical abuse, encouraged by the climate of the times, as a popular response to some supposed currency transactions of local priests. 

All this, by the way, with the aid of Google Translate.  I am very impressed with how well it now handles German.

The way that an overpowering cultural force impacts on the church is, sadly, a subject that we in the anglophone world may find it useful to revise.  There is more sustained hostility to Christianity in our days than there has been for centuries, and the manipulation of opinion to “justify” this is everywhere.

Share
  1. [1]Ernst Christian Helmreich, The German Churches under Hitler, 1979, p.267.  Google books snippet here.
  2. [2]Taken from http://www.digitale-schule-bayern.de/dsdaten/434/63.doc, which states that it was sung in the streets of Nuremberg in 1934, and contains a series of extracts from Nazi papers.  A reference for the song is given: Thomas Breuer, Verordneter Wandel? Der Widerstand zwischen nationalsozialistischem Herrschaftsanspruch und traditionaler Lebenswelt im Erzbistum Bamberg [=Obligatory change? The conflict between Nazi rule and traditional life in the archdiocese of Bamburg], Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 1990, p. 131.
  3. [3]Friday 24th May, 1946, Online here.

New contexts for old texts: but no public please

Via Paleojudaica I learn of a workshop, taking place in Oslo, which sounds rather interesting:

WORKSHOP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OSLO:

Textual Transmission and Manuscript Culture: Textual Fluidity, “New Philology,” and the Nag Hammadi (and Related) Codices

This is the first major international workshop of the NEWCONT-project.Starting tomorrow. Pseudepigrapha and Hermetica figure in the program as well.

Background on Project NEWCONT is here.

But to my surprise, it says that attendance is “by invitation only”.  I wonder why?

The project page is here.  The whole project seems eminently sound.

Share

An anecdote that mentions Solomon Caesar Malan

Orientalist Solomon Caesar Malan lived in the middle of the 19th century, and his fluency in languages was legendary.  He is mentioned in Tuckwell’s Reminiscences of Oxford,[1] which gives such a picture of the Oxford of the 1830’s.

Last weekend, while reading a book of anecdotes, I came across a story in which he appears.  It would be interesting to know the source of it, as the source given is not going to be the original. Probably it comes from the biography of Malan by his son[2].

One of the greatest evangelistic hymns of all time was written by a woman who knew well the release and peace that come from confessing one’s sins and failures to God.  “Just as I am,” a hymn frequently sung at the close of evangelistic meetings, was written by Charlotte Elliot, who at one time had been very bitter with God about the circumstances in her life.

Charlotte was an invalid from her youth and deeply resented the constraints her handicap placed on her activities.  In an emotional outburst on one occasional, she expressed those feelings to Dr. Caesar Malan, a minister visiting her home.  He listened and was touched by her distress, but he insisted that her problems should not divert her attention from what she most needed to hear.  He challenged her to turn her life over to God, to come to Him just as she was, with all  her bitterness and anger.

She resented what seemed to be an almost callous attitude on his part, but God spoke to her through him, and she committed her life to the Lord.  Each year on the anniversary of that decision, Dr. Malan wrote Charlotte a letter, encouraging her to continue to be strong in the faith.  But even as a Christian she had doubts and struggles.

One particularly sore point was her inability to effectively get out and serve the Lord.  At times she almost resented her brother’s successful preaching and evangelistic ministry.  She longed to be of use to God herself, but she felt that her health and physical condition prevented it.  Then in 1836, on the fourteenth anniversary of her conversion, while she was alone in the evening, the forty-seven-year-old Charlotte Elliot wrote her spiritual autobiography in verse.  Here, in the prayer of confession, she poured out her feelings to God — feelings that countless individuals have identified with in the generations that followed.  The third stanza, perhaps more than the others, described her own pilgrimage.

Just as I am, tho tossed about
With many a conflict, many a doubt,
Fightings and fears within, without,
O Lamb of God, I come! I come!

Many years later, when reflecting on the impact his sister made in penning this one hymn, the Reverend Henry Venn Elliot said, “In the course of a long ministry I hope I have been permitted to see some fruit of my labours, but I feel far more has been done by a single hymn of my sister’s, ‘Just as I am'” — Ruth A. Tucker, Sacred Stories.[3]

Let us see what Tuckwell says about this excellent man.[4]

Contemporary with these was a genius perhaps more remarkable, certainly more unusual, than any of them. In 1833 Solomon Caesar Malan matriculated at St. Edmund’s Hall, a young man with a young wife, son to a Swiss Pastor, speaking as yet broken English, but fluent Latin, Romaic, French, Spanish, Italian, German ; and a proficient at twenty-two years old in Hebrew, Arabic, Sanskrit. He won the Boden and the Kennicott Scholarships, took a Second Class, missing his First through the imperfection of his English, was ordained, became Professor in Calcutta, gathered up Chinese, Japanese, the various Indian, Malay, Persian tongues, came home to the valuable living of Broadwinsor, where he lived, when not travelling, through forty years, amassing a library in more than seventy languages, the majority of which he spoke with freedom, read familiarly, wrote with a clearness and beauty rivalling the best native caligraphy. In his frequent Eastern rambles he was able, say his fellow-travellers, to chat in market and bazaar with every one whom he met. On a visit to the Bishop of Innereth he preached a Georgian sermon in the Cathedral. He published twenty – six translations of English theological works, in Chinese and Japanese, Arabic and Syriac, Armenian, Russian, Ethiopic, Coptic. Five-fold outnumbering the fecundity of his royal namesake, he left behind him a collection of 16,000 Proverbs, taken from original Oriental texts, each written in its native character and translated. So unique was the variety of his Pentecostal attainments that experts could not be found even to catalogue the four thousand books which he presented, multa gemens, with pathetic lamentation over their surrender, to the Indian Institute at Oxford.

I encountered him at three periods of his life. First as a young man at the evening parties of John Hill, Vice-Principal of St. Edmund’s Hall, where prevailed tea and coffee, pietistic Low Church talk, prayer and hymnody of portentous length, yet palliated by the chance of sharing Bible or hymn-book with one of the host’s four charming daughters. Twenty years later I recall him as a guest in Oxford Common Rooms, laying down the law on questions of Scriptural interpretation, his abysmal fund of learning and his dogmatic insistency floated by the rollicking fun of his illustrations and their delightful touches of travelled personal experience. Finally, in his old age I spent a long summer day with him in the Broadwinsor home, enjoying his library, aviary, workshop, drawings; his hospitality stimulated by the discovery that in some of his favourite pursuits I was, longo intervallo, an enthusiast like himself. He was a benevolently autocratic vicar, controlling his parish with patriarchally imperious rule, original, racy, trenchant, in Sunday School and sermons. It was his wont to take into the pulpit his college cap : into it he had pasted words of Scripture which he always read to himself before preaching. They were taken from the story of Balaam : ” And the Lord opened the mouth of the ass, and she said …”

He died at eighty-two, to have been admitted, let us hope, in the unknown land to comradeship of no ordinary brotherhood by spirits of every nation, kindred, tongue; to have found there, ranged upon celestial shelves, the Platonic archetypes of the priceless books which it tore his mortal heart to leave.

Tuckwell was no Christian, although quite happy to live and die as an Anglican clergyman, and his discomfort with real Christianity is evident in the portrait that he gives.  Those who have committed themselves to Christ sometimes forget that those who have not done so, good people as they may be, really do have their hearts in a different place.  Indeed this week I read some perceptive words in Raising Kids the World Will Hate:[5]

Reading this, I realized that if God answers my prayer for my son to be a follower of Christ, people will hate him. People will absolutely, unquestionably be repulsed by my son.

If God graciously saves my Oscar, people will call him a bigot and a homophobe. Some will ridicule him as a male chauvinist as they scorn his “sexist” beliefs. He’ll be despised as closed-minded for saying that Jesus Christ is not only God but the only God. He will probably meet a girl who insults his manhood or considers him old fashioned for waiting until marriage to have sex. His peers will think him a prude. Bullies will call him a coward. His integrity will draw insults like “goody two shoes” (I don’t even know what that means).

Teachers will think that that my son ignores scientific facts about our origins, prompting his classmates to mark him an idiot. People will tell him he has been led astray by his parents down an ancient path of misguided morality masked as a relationship with God. Financial advisors will think he’s irresponsibly generous. When he takes a stand, there will be those who will not tolerate his intolerance. He will be judged as judgmental. He will have enemies, and I’ll be asking him to love them, and even for that he’ll look foolish.

This is indeed what it means to be a Christian.  This week I myself encountered a woman who did called a generous impulse of my own as “weird”; and she was a church-goer, but her heart was not centred on Christ.  Malan, evidently, encountered the same incomprehension.

I first encountered Malan’s name attached to a translation from the Armenian of a sermon attributed to Severian of Gabala, but in reality by Eusebius of Emesa.[6]  The sermon is an excellent one.  Interestingly he dedicates his book to his friend Charles Marriot, the unsung labourer who edited and translated so many of the Oxford Library of the Fathers series.

Malan’s book and life deserve more attention than I can give them this evening, however.  Perhaps another time we will return to them.

Share
  1. [1]Archive.org version here, Google books version available in the US only here.
  2. [2]A. N. Malan, Solomon Caesar Malan, D.D. : memorials of his life and writings, 1897.  On Google Books in the US (only) here.
  3. [3]Charles R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s ultimate book of illustrations & quotes, Nashville:Thomas Nelson, 1998, p.261-2.
  4. [4]P.95-98.
  5. [5]Via Trevin Wax.
  6. [6]On the Sufferings and Death of our Lord, in: S. C. Malan, Meditations for every Wednesday and Friday in Lent on a prayer of S. Ephraim, London (1859), pp.215-231.  Sermon is online here; the whole book at Archive.org here.