{"id":7679,"date":"2011-11-19T19:23:15","date_gmt":"2011-11-19T19:23:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/?p=7679"},"modified":"2011-11-19T19:23:15","modified_gmt":"2011-11-19T19:23:15","slug":"how-do-we-know-that-mithras-sidekicks-were-called-cautes-and-cautopates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/2011\/11\/19\/how-do-we-know-that-mithras-sidekicks-were-called-cautes-and-cautopates\/","title":{"rendered":"How do we know that Mithras&#8217; sidekicks were called &#8220;Cautes&#8221; and &#8220;Cautopates&#8221;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Every temple of Mithras had a bas-relief at one end depicting Mithras killing the bull.\u00a0 On either side stand two figures carrying torches, one with the flame pointing up, the other with it pointing down.\u00a0 Every textbook refers to these as &#8220;Cautes&#8221; and &#8220;Cautopates&#8221;, although no literary text mentions either.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">So how do we know that these were their names?\u00a0 And which is which?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In Cumont&#8217;s <em>Textes et Monumentes<\/em>, vol. 1, p.207 we find the following statement about the torch-bearers or <em>dadophores<\/em>.\u00a0 (The reader should bear in mind that in vol. 2, for some curious reason, Cumont gave the inscriptions first, with numerals; and then the monuments, with fresh numbers; and that a relief or statue with an inscription would be listed twice).<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">By a happy accident we know the barbarous names that the two dadophores\u00a0bore in Mithraic ritual.\u00a0 Two pairs of statues accompanied with inscriptions have recently\u00a0come to light, and demonstrate that the being with the raised torch is named <em>Cautes<\/em> and the one with the lowered torch is named <em>Cautopates<\/em>.[5]\u00a0 Elsewhere the statues themselves have not been preserved, but the pedestals on which they stood have survived, grouped in pairs, and on one is engraved the dedication <em>Caute<\/em> or <em>Cauti<\/em> and on the other <em>Cautipati<\/em>. [6]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The footnotes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5) Monument 248 c, discovered in 1851, which bears the inscription <em>D. I. M. Cautopati<\/em>, was supposed at this period by Dieffenbach and by Ring to indicate that the dadophor with the lowered torch was called <em>Cautopates<\/em>, but that <em>Cautes<\/em> and <em>Cautopates<\/em> were synonymous.\u00a0 New discoveries permit us to rectify this mistake.\u00a0 <em>Cautes <\/em>and <em>Cautopates<\/em> are the two dadophores at Sarmizegetusa: mon. 140 (inscr. 259); at Heddernheim: mon. 253 i, 2, 4 (inscr. 441 b, c).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6) Aquileia: inscr. 165 a, b; Aquincum: mon. 213 d, inscr. 329, 330 &#8212; Similarly in the temple recently discovered at Pettau by Gurlitt, an altar has been brought to light with the dedication <em>Cauti<\/em>, another with <em>Cautopati<\/em>. &#8212; Were there two dedications to <em>Caute<\/em> at Heddernheim?\u00a0 Cf. Lehner, <em>Korrespondbl. Westd. Zeitsch.<\/em>, XVII, no. 89, p.129 &#8212; The complete list of inscriptions mentioning these deities is given in vol. 2, p. 533, col. a. &#8212; The only forms that are encountered are <em>Caute<\/em> or <em>Cauti<\/em> or <em>Cautopati<\/em> or <em>Kautopati<\/em>.\u00a0 The dative <em>Cauto<\/em> and therefore the nominative <em>Cautus<\/em> does not exist (inscr. 165 a, note). &#8212; The abbreviation <em>C. P.<\/em> for <em>Cautopati<\/em>, does not prove that we should decompose this name into two words.\u00a0 Rather it serves to distinguish it from <em>Caute<\/em>, for which the abbreviation is a simple <em>C.<\/em> (inscr. 371, 434).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">That is a lot of material packed into a couple of lines and a couple of footnotes; but Cumont was a great man, which is why his work in some respects has yet to be superceded, 110 years later.\u00a0 Let&#8217;s look at some of these references.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Sarmizegetusa<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In vol. 2, p.283-4, under monument 140 we find these images of statues of the two figures, taken from the Mithraeum at Sarmizegetusa (see.p.280 f.) or Varh\u00e9ly (Gr\u00e9ditchj\u00e9) in Hungary in\u00a01881-3.\u00a0 Happily for us, they have inscriptions on the base.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/cautes_and_cautopates_mmm140.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7680\" title=\"cautes_and_cautopates_mmm140\" src=\"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/cautes_and_cautopates_mmm140.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"464\" height=\"571\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These are described as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mithraic dadophores, in the\u00a0usual costume and pose.\u00a0\u00a0They carry in\u00a0their right hands, one a lowered torch, the other a raised\u00a0torch, but both are broken &#8230; in the left hand the first carries a scorpion, the second the head of a bull.\u00a0 On the bases are inscriptions 259.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The inscriptions 259 can be found on p.135 of the same volume, where they are listed as CIL III 7922.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a) Cautopati sac(rum) | Synethus adiu[t(or)] | tabul(arii)\u00a0 | v(otum) s(olvit) l(ibens) m(erito)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b) . . . . v(otum) s(olvit) l(ibens) m(erito)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">That identifies &#8220;Cautopates&#8221;\u00a0as the object of the votive offering on the first statue-altar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Heddernheim<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Monument 253 is in vol. 2, p.372, and covers the third Mithraeum found at Heddernheim, in 1887.\u00a0 There is a mistake in Cumont&#8217;s note in vol. 1; it should be item j, not i, that is referenced.\u00a0 This is the stela, carved on three sides.\u00a0 Cumont gives fig. 298, 290 and 291, from photographs:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7686\" title=\"cautes_and_cautopates_mmm253\" src=\"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/cautes_and_cautopates_mmm253.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"654\" height=\"643\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Inscription 441 is vol. 2, p.155-6, transcribing the above.\u00a0 On the front:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D(eo) inv(icto) Mit(hrae) | Senilius Car|antinus | c(ivis) Mediom(atricus) | v(otum) s(olvit) l(ibens) l(aetus) m(erito) | Sive Cracissius.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Under a representation of Mithras born from a rock are the words:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petram g[e]ne[t]ricem.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the right-hand side, under the torchbearer\u00a0holding a torch\u00a0up:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Caute.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Under the person on an urn:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Oceanus.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the left-hand side, under the torchbearer holding a torch pointing down:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Caut(o)p(ati).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Under the eagle on a sphere:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Celum.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">That seems fairly final: we have the image, and a label underneath.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An afterthought:\u00a0inscription 442, Friedberg, (mon. 248) reads &#8220;D(eo) I(nvicto) M(ithrae) | Cautopati&#8221; which would seem to suggest that Cautopates (and therefore Cautes also) was an\u00a0aspect of Mithras himself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Every temple of Mithras had a bas-relief at one end depicting Mithras killing the bull.\u00a0 On either side stand two figures carrying torches, one with the flame pointing up, the other with it pointing down.\u00a0 Every textbook refers to these as &#8220;Cautes&#8221; and &#8220;Cautopates&#8221;, although no literary text mentions either. So how do we know [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[19],"tags":[384,385,1142],"class_list":["post-7679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-from-my-diary-announcements","tag-cautes","tag-cautopates","tag-mithras"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7679\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roger-pearse.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}