Difference between revisions of "Stephen bar Sudhaili"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
STEPHEN BAR SUDHAILE, a Syrian mystical writer, who flourished about the end of the 5th century A.D. The earlier part of his career was passed at Edessa, of which he may have been a native. He afterwards removed to Jerusalem, where he lived as a monk, and endeavoured to make converts to his peculiar doctrines, both by teaching among the community there and by letters to his former friends at Edessa. He was the author of commentaries on the Bible and other theological works. Two of his eminent contemporaries, the Monophysites Jacob of Serugh (d. 515-21) and Philoxenus of Mabbogh (d. 523), wrote letters in condemnation of his teaching. His two main theses which they attacked were (1) the limited duration of the future punishment of sinners, (2) the pantheistic doctrine that all nature is consubstantial with the Divine essence that the whole universe has emanated from God, and will in the end return to and be absorbed in him. | STEPHEN BAR SUDHAILE, a Syrian mystical writer, who flourished about the end of the 5th century A.D. The earlier part of his career was passed at Edessa, of which he may have been a native. He afterwards removed to Jerusalem, where he lived as a monk, and endeavoured to make converts to his peculiar doctrines, both by teaching among the community there and by letters to his former friends at Edessa. He was the author of commentaries on the Bible and other theological works. Two of his eminent contemporaries, the Monophysites Jacob of Serugh (d. 515-21) and Philoxenus of Mabbogh (d. 523), wrote letters in condemnation of his teaching. His two main theses which they attacked were (1) the limited duration of the future punishment of sinners, (2) the pantheistic doctrine that all nature is consubstantial with the Divine essence that the whole universe has emanated from God, and will in the end return to and be absorbed in him. | ||
| − | The fame of Stephen as a writer rests on his identification with the author of a treatise which survives in a single Syriac MS. (Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 7189, written mainly in the 13th century), ''The book of Hierotheus on the hidden mysteries of the house of God''. The work claims to have been composed in the 1st century AD. by a certain Hierotheus who was the disciple of St Paul and the teacher of Dionysius the Areopagite. But, like the works which pass under the name of Dionysius, it is undoubtedly pseudonymous, and most Syriac writers who mention it attribute it to Stephen. An interesting discussion and summary of the book have been given by A. L. Frothingham (Stephen bar Sudhaili, Leiden, 1886), | + | The fame of Stephen as a writer rests on his identification with the author of a treatise which survives in a single Syriac MS. (Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 7189, written mainly in the 13th century), ''The book of Hierotheus on the hidden mysteries of the house of God''. The work claims to have been composed in the 1st century AD. by a certain Hierotheus who was the disciple of St Paul and the teacher of Dionysius the Areopagite. But, like the works which pass under the name of Dionysius, it is undoubtedly pseudonymous, and most Syriac writers who mention it attribute it to Stephen. An interesting discussion and summary of the book have been given by A. L. Frothingham (Stephen bar Sudhaili, Leiden, 1886), and an English translation was published in 1927 by the Texts and Translations Society. From Frothingham's analysis we learn that the work consists of five books; after briefly describing the origin of the world by emanation from the Supreme Good it is mainly occupied with the description of the stages by which the mind returns to union with God, who finally becomes all in all. To describe the contents in a few words: at the beginning we find the statement regarding absolute existence, and the emanation from primordial essence of the spiritual and material universes: then comes, what occupies almost the entire work, the experience of the mind in search of perfection during this life. Finally comes the description of the various phases of existence as the mind rises into complete union with, and ultimate absorption into, the primitive essence. The keynote to the experience of the mind is its absolute identification with Christ; but the son finally resigns the kingdom unto the Father, and all distinct existence comes to an end, being lost in the chaos of the Good (Frothingham, p. 92). One of the most curious features of the work is the misguided skill with which the language of the Bible is pressed into the service of pantheistic speculation. In this and other respects the book harmonizes well with the picture of Stephens teaching afforded by the letter of Philoxenus to the Edessene priests Abraham and Orestes (Frothingham, pp. 284-8). The Book of Hierosheus is probably an original Syriac work, and not translated from Greek. Its relation to the Pseudo-Dionysian literature is a difficult question; probably Frothingham (p. 83) goes too far in suggesting that it was prior to all the pseudo-Dionysian writings (cf. Ryssel in Zeitschrfft fur Kirchengeschichte). |
The unique MS. in which the book of Hierotheus survives furnishes along with its text the commentary made upon it by Theodosius, patriarch of Antioch (887-896), who appears to have sympathized with its teaching. A rearrangement and abridgment of the work was made by the great Monophysite author Barhebraeus (1226-1286), who expunged or garbled much of its unorthodox teaching. It is interesting to note that the identical copy which he used is the MS. which now survives in the British Museum. (N. M.) | The unique MS. in which the book of Hierotheus survives furnishes along with its text the commentary made upon it by Theodosius, patriarch of Antioch (887-896), who appears to have sympathized with its teaching. A rearrangement and abridgment of the work was made by the great Monophysite author Barhebraeus (1226-1286), who expunged or garbled much of its unorthodox teaching. It is interesting to note that the identical copy which he used is the MS. which now survives in the British Museum. (N. M.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | (From the 1911 Encyclopedia). | ||
=== Bibliography === | === Bibliography === | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
* Frothingham, Arthur L. (Arthur Lincoln), (1859-1923), ''Stephen bar Sudaili, the Syrian mystic, and the book of Hierotheos'', Leyden : E.J. Brill (1886). 111 p ; 25 cm. Includes two short works in Syriac with English translations and an English "summary" of the book of Hierotheos (Ketava de-kudsha Iyerute'us) | * Frothingham, Arthur L. (Arthur Lincoln), (1859-1923), ''Stephen bar Sudaili, the Syrian mystic, and the book of Hierotheos'', Leyden : E.J. Brill (1886). 111 p ; 25 cm. Includes two short works in Syriac with English translations and an English "summary" of the book of Hierotheos (Ketava de-kudsha Iyerute'us) | ||
| − | * ''The Book which is called the Book of the Holy Hierotheos, with extracts from the prolegomena and commentary of Theodosios of Antioch and from the "Book of Excerpts" and other works of Gregory Bar-Herbræus''. Edited and translated by | + | * ''The Book which is called the Book of the Holy Hierotheos, with extracts from the prolegomena and commentary of Theodosios of Antioch and from the "Book of Excerpts" and other works of Gregory Bar-Herbræus''. Edited and translated by Fred Sshipley MARSH (d. 1953). Eng. & Syriac. London, Pub. for the Text and Translation Society by Williams and Norgate (1927). pp. viii, 297, 180. 8o. (Facsimile in 1969, ISBN 057699166X, pub. Gregg International Publishers : Farnborough, Hants). Syriac texts with English translation. The Syriac text has been taken mainly from British museum ms. Add. 7189, which contains the whole of the Book of Hierotheus and the Prolegomena and Commentary of Theodosius of Antioch. In the present work the text of the Book of Hierotheus is separated from the commentary in which, in the manuscript, it is embedded, and specimens only of the Prolegomena and Commentary of Theodosius are published, and not the whole; to this have been added some extracts from the writings of Bar Hebræus (mainly from British museum ms. Oriental 1017) and a few specimens of the original work of the scholiast of the Harvard ms. (Semitic museum no. 4009) |
Latest revision as of 13:25, 18 November 2005
STEPHEN BAR SUDHAILE, a Syrian mystical writer, who flourished about the end of the 5th century A.D. The earlier part of his career was passed at Edessa, of which he may have been a native. He afterwards removed to Jerusalem, where he lived as a monk, and endeavoured to make converts to his peculiar doctrines, both by teaching among the community there and by letters to his former friends at Edessa. He was the author of commentaries on the Bible and other theological works. Two of his eminent contemporaries, the Monophysites Jacob of Serugh (d. 515-21) and Philoxenus of Mabbogh (d. 523), wrote letters in condemnation of his teaching. His two main theses which they attacked were (1) the limited duration of the future punishment of sinners, (2) the pantheistic doctrine that all nature is consubstantial with the Divine essence that the whole universe has emanated from God, and will in the end return to and be absorbed in him.
The fame of Stephen as a writer rests on his identification with the author of a treatise which survives in a single Syriac MS. (Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 7189, written mainly in the 13th century), The book of Hierotheus on the hidden mysteries of the house of God. The work claims to have been composed in the 1st century AD. by a certain Hierotheus who was the disciple of St Paul and the teacher of Dionysius the Areopagite. But, like the works which pass under the name of Dionysius, it is undoubtedly pseudonymous, and most Syriac writers who mention it attribute it to Stephen. An interesting discussion and summary of the book have been given by A. L. Frothingham (Stephen bar Sudhaili, Leiden, 1886), and an English translation was published in 1927 by the Texts and Translations Society. From Frothingham's analysis we learn that the work consists of five books; after briefly describing the origin of the world by emanation from the Supreme Good it is mainly occupied with the description of the stages by which the mind returns to union with God, who finally becomes all in all. To describe the contents in a few words: at the beginning we find the statement regarding absolute existence, and the emanation from primordial essence of the spiritual and material universes: then comes, what occupies almost the entire work, the experience of the mind in search of perfection during this life. Finally comes the description of the various phases of existence as the mind rises into complete union with, and ultimate absorption into, the primitive essence. The keynote to the experience of the mind is its absolute identification with Christ; but the son finally resigns the kingdom unto the Father, and all distinct existence comes to an end, being lost in the chaos of the Good (Frothingham, p. 92). One of the most curious features of the work is the misguided skill with which the language of the Bible is pressed into the service of pantheistic speculation. In this and other respects the book harmonizes well with the picture of Stephens teaching afforded by the letter of Philoxenus to the Edessene priests Abraham and Orestes (Frothingham, pp. 284-8). The Book of Hierosheus is probably an original Syriac work, and not translated from Greek. Its relation to the Pseudo-Dionysian literature is a difficult question; probably Frothingham (p. 83) goes too far in suggesting that it was prior to all the pseudo-Dionysian writings (cf. Ryssel in Zeitschrfft fur Kirchengeschichte).
The unique MS. in which the book of Hierotheus survives furnishes along with its text the commentary made upon it by Theodosius, patriarch of Antioch (887-896), who appears to have sympathized with its teaching. A rearrangement and abridgment of the work was made by the great Monophysite author Barhebraeus (1226-1286), who expunged or garbled much of its unorthodox teaching. It is interesting to note that the identical copy which he used is the MS. which now survives in the British Museum. (N. M.)
(From the 1911 Encyclopedia).
Bibliography
- Frothingham, Arthur L. (Arthur Lincoln), (1859-1923), Stephen bar Sudaili, the Syrian mystic, and the book of Hierotheos, Leyden : E.J. Brill (1886). 111 p ; 25 cm. Includes two short works in Syriac with English translations and an English "summary" of the book of Hierotheos (Ketava de-kudsha Iyerute'us)
- The Book which is called the Book of the Holy Hierotheos, with extracts from the prolegomena and commentary of Theodosios of Antioch and from the "Book of Excerpts" and other works of Gregory Bar-Herbræus. Edited and translated by Fred Sshipley MARSH (d. 1953). Eng. & Syriac. London, Pub. for the Text and Translation Society by Williams and Norgate (1927). pp. viii, 297, 180. 8o. (Facsimile in 1969, ISBN 057699166X, pub. Gregg International Publishers : Farnborough, Hants). Syriac texts with English translation. The Syriac text has been taken mainly from British museum ms. Add. 7189, which contains the whole of the Book of Hierotheus and the Prolegomena and Commentary of Theodosius of Antioch. In the present work the text of the Book of Hierotheus is separated from the commentary in which, in the manuscript, it is embedded, and specimens only of the Prolegomena and Commentary of Theodosius are published, and not the whole; to this have been added some extracts from the writings of Bar Hebræus (mainly from British museum ms. Oriental 1017) and a few specimens of the original work of the scholiast of the Harvard ms. (Semitic museum no. 4009)
