Difference between revisions of "Notes on Syriac Grammar"
Rogerpearse (talk | contribs) |
Rogerpearse (talk | contribs) (→Verbs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Verbs == | == Verbs == | ||
− | Verbs have only perfect tense and imperfect tense, plus a rash of participles and infinitives. ( | + | The terminology applied to bits of verbs in Syriac uses the same words found in Latin, and applies them to different things. (One can only presume that some early Syriacologist was dropped on the head as a child). |
+ | |||
+ | Tenses are the same idea as in Latin, but named funny, and only a few of them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Voices in Syriac (active, passive, etc) are called 'conjugations' (what a stupid, stupid idea). They're different to those in Latin and English. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The type of verb (which would be called a conjugation in Latin) has no name, but is named after various example verbs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Tenses === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Verbs have only perfect tense and imperfect tense, plus a rash of participles and infinitives. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::'perfect' tense = actually any 'past' tense. | ||
+ | ::'imperfect' tense = actually a 'future' tense. (Which drongo thought that one up?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you need to say something in the present tense, use a participle. (how?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === 'Conjugations' (=voices) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | What the grammar calls a 'conjugation' is actually a voice. There are 6 of them, including the active and passive. (list them: stuff on ethpeal, etc, and REAL transcription of them) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Types of verb (which would be called conjugations in Latin) === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ...several of these, strong and weak ... |
Revision as of 20:49, 3 April 2006
Contents
Notes on Syriac Grammar
Much simpler than Latin. Add more when I learn more.
Nouns
Nouns do not decline. They change by number (singular and plural), gender (masculine or feminine), and 'state' (emphatic, absolute, and construct).
Number and gender are as in Latin.
'State' is peculiar to Aramaic. 'Emphatic' has no connection with emphasis. No idea what emphatic and absolute indicate otherwise. (Perhaps we translate them both the same?) Construct is used like a genetive, when one noun in construct precedes another in emphatic (like romanorum imperator - GEN+NOM). But genetive is normally handled by a specific symbol (in serto in green book).
(How do they do direct object/indirect object?)
Verbs
The terminology applied to bits of verbs in Syriac uses the same words found in Latin, and applies them to different things. (One can only presume that some early Syriacologist was dropped on the head as a child).
Tenses are the same idea as in Latin, but named funny, and only a few of them.
Voices in Syriac (active, passive, etc) are called 'conjugations' (what a stupid, stupid idea). They're different to those in Latin and English.
The type of verb (which would be called a conjugation in Latin) has no name, but is named after various example verbs.
Tenses
Verbs have only perfect tense and imperfect tense, plus a rash of participles and infinitives.
- 'perfect' tense = actually any 'past' tense.
- 'imperfect' tense = actually a 'future' tense. (Which drongo thought that one up?)
If you need to say something in the present tense, use a participle. (how?)
'Conjugations' (=voices)
What the grammar calls a 'conjugation' is actually a voice. There are 6 of them, including the active and passive. (list them: stuff on ethpeal, etc, and REAL transcription of them)
Types of verb (which would be called conjugations in Latin)
...several of these, strong and weak ...